Legal Opinion

Voloshin v. Voloshin

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 17, 1987No. 4371PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

In this appeal from the judgment dissolving the marriage of the parties, the defendant husband claims an abuse of discretion by a state trial referee acting as the trial court (1) in finding that the defendant intentionally made misrepresentations on his financial affidavit, (2) in crediting the testimony of the plaintiff’s expert witness’ appraisal of a leasehold interest held by the defendant, (3) in finding that the defendant’s behavior was the cause of the breakdown of the marriage, and (4) in awarding attorney’s fees and costs to the plaintiff. We find no error.

The parties had been…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Timm v. TimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Turgeon v. TurgeonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Berchtold v. MaggiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Holley v. HolleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. Oneglia v. OnegliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Lawler v. LawlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Cuneo v. CuneoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Elliott v. ElliottConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API