Rose v. Rose

The sole issue of this appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding a substantial change in circumstances not contemplated by the parties at the time of the dissolution of their marriage, and, therefore, granting the plaintiff’s motion to modify the amount of child support. See Sanchione v. Sanchione, 173 Conn. 397, 407, 378 A.2d 522 (1977); General Statutes § 46b-86 (a).

*392The plaintiff wife’s motion for modification was made approximately seven and one-half months after the dissolution. It was based upon her allegations that her financial status had changed, and that the defendant…