Legal Opinion
Lueck v. New York Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 15, 1932No. 28,622PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Action to recover $2,000 on a life insurance policy. Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
Defendant is a foreign life insurance company licensed to do business in Minnesota. One Hastings was its soliciting agent at Pine Island, in this state, negotiating contracts of insurance. After solicitations he secured an application for a policy from Arnold Lueck, a 17-year old son of plaintiff, who was named therein as beneficiáry. Hastings had Arnold examined by defendant’s local physician oh May 12,1928. This examination showed the applicant to be an insurable risk.
On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kilborn v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Olson v. American Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Sawyer v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Enge v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Hoyle v. Grange Life Assurance Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ransom v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Fortin v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- First National Bank v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934