Legal Opinion
Enge v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 27, 1931No. 28,028PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment against it for $825.46.
Defendant is a foreign life insurance company licensed to do business in Minnesota, where it has a resident general agent authorized to employ and pay soliciting agents to take applications for life insurance.
One of such agents solicited and secured an application from Edwin Enge for a $408, weekly-premium insurance policy. Another such agent about a year later solicited and secured an appli cation for a like policy for $297. Each application was in turn sent to the main offices of the company and approved. The policies applied for were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Draper v. Oswego County Fire Relief Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- McAlpine v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Clark v. DyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Pomerenke v. Farmers Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Lawien v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Ser Yang v. Western-Southern Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Consolidated Lumber Co. v. Mercury Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.