Legal Opinion
First National Bank v. New York Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 6, 1934No. 29,740PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 255 N.W. 831, 258 N.W. 13, 592. In an action upon a life insurance policy the defendant had a directed verdict, and the plaintiffs come here on appeal from an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
Born October 14, 1893, the insurable age of George Seckosan changed from 34 to 35 on April 14, 1928. April 1, 1928, he applied to defendant for life insurance in the sum of $3,000 with disability features and double indemnity for accidental death. By his application he asked that the policy be dated April 1, 1928. He gave his note due May 1,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McMaster v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- August Prange & Bankers Trust Co. v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Wilkie v. New York Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Kilborn v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- McCampbell v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Juster v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935