Kilborn v. Prudential Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for'Swift county, entered pursuant’ to the findings and order of Powers, J.
1Opinion of the CourtJblliott, J.
This was an action to recover upon a policy of life insurance. The case was tried by the court without a jury and judgment ordered for the defendant. From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.
It appears from the stipulation of facts that during the time referred to the defendant was a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New Jersey for the purpose of writing contracts of insurance and was duly authorized to write such contracts of insurance within the state of Minnesota. Timberlake & Coan were the general state agents of the defendant for the state of Minnesota, for the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- New York Life Insurance v. BabcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Miller v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Continental Insurance v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Unterharnscheidt v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Amarillo Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- New York Life Insurance v. PikeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.