Floystrup v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
This appeal presents yet another attack on the constitutionality of the Berkeley Rent Stabilization and Eviction for Good Cause Ordinance (Ordinance). Appellants (landlords), owners of apartment units in Berkeley, claim that the provisions of the Ordinance allowing tenants to withhold rent because of landlords’ failure to register1 are unconstitutional on their face and as applied. McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd. (1989) 49 Cal.3d 348 [261 Cal.Rptr. 318, 777 P.2d 91], a recently decided Supreme Court case, supports landlords’ position and mandates reversal.
I.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Frankel v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Chacon v. LitkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Comb v. PayPal, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Sutherland v. Barclays American/Mortgage Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Bradshaw v. ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.