Legal Opinion
Comb v. PayPal, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 30, 2002No. C-02-1227 JF (PVT), C-02-2777 JF (PVT)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO COMPEL INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION
FOGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and related remedies on behalf of a purported nationwide class for alleged violations of state and federal law by Defendant PayPal, Inc. (“PayPal”). PayPal moves to compel individual arbitration pursuant to the arbitration clause contained in its standard User Agreement and the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. The Court has read and considered the moving, responding and supplemental papers as well as the oral arguments presented by counsel on August 12, 2002. For…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Feldman v. Google, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Karvaly v. Ebay, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.