Legal Opinion
Frankel v. Board of Dental Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 1996No. C016474PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, J.
Gerard Frankel, D.D.S., appeals from the judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandamus to require the Board of Dental Examiners to set aside a disciplinary order which is based upon his assent to the settlement of an accusation filed against him by its executive director, Georgetta Coleman, and to allow him to proceed with a contested hearing on the matter.
The “Stipulation for Settlement” was executed by Frankel and his attorney, and by counsel for Coleman. In it, Frankel expressly gave up his right to a contested hearing on the accusation, admitted allegations that…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Roth v. Garcia MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re AlvernazCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Natividad Ocanas, Santiago Casiano, Jr., Ramiro Gonzalez Alvarado, Rogelio Jose De La Garza and Amadeo Uresti GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Alexander v. Codemasters Group LimitedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Teamsters, Local 396 v. Nasa Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Chacon v. LitkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Barroso v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.