Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Heims

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 9, 1953No. 1497PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. Brosman, Judge:

The accused, Heims, was convicted, following trial by general court-martial in Korea, of the willful disobedience of a lawful order of a superior noncom-missioned officer, in violation of Article 91, Uniform Code .of Military Justice, 50 USC § 685. The conviction was approved by the convening authority, and has also been affirmed by a board of review in the office of the The Judge Advocate General, United States Army. On petition of the accused, this Court granted further review, limited to-the following two questions:

“1. Whether the law officer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. GinnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. SoukupUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. SimmonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. MeeksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. HooperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. AmieUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API