Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Hardwick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 17, 1980No. 78-1008-L-2, CA 15249PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

In this action by a real estate broker to recover a commission allegedly owed him by defendant sellers, we affirmed the trial court’s judgment for defendants. Nicholson v. Hardwick, 47 Or App 851, 615 P2d 406 (1980). We concluded there was a conflict in the evidence regarding whether the failure of the contemplated sale to be consummated was the fault of the sellers. We held the conflict was resolved in favor of defendants. Plaintiff petitioned for review in the Supreme Court, and under Rule 10.10, Rules of Appellate Procedure, the case is automatically before us as a petition for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marnon v. Vaughan Motor Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Dorsey Et Ux. v. Tisby Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Associated Oil Co. v. La BranchOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fogdall v. Lewis & Clark CollegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Nicholson v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dartmouth Savings Bank v. F.O.S. AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Wagner v. Ryder Truck LinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. First Interstate Bank v. BergendahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API