Legal Opinion

Eagle Industries, Inc. v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 27, 1994No. 9011-07573; CA A74864PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in this action arising from a dispute over defendant’s attorney fees. Plaintiffs Linda and James Tucker own plaintiff Eagle Industries, Inc. (Eagle). Defendant is the attorney who represented plaintiffs in a lawsuit involving Toyoda Machinery USA, Inc. (Toyoda). Eagle was interested in bidding on government contracts for which it needed a specialized machine. Toyoda represented that it had a machine that would meet Eagle’s needs, and Eagle purchased the machine. However, the machine did not perform as represented, and Eagle was unable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Payless Drug Stores Northwest v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Morrill v. RountreeOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Toomey v. MOORE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Wescold, Inc. v. Logan International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Robinowitz v. PozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In re ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API