Eagle Industries, Inc. v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in this action arising from a dispute over defendant’s attorney fees. Plaintiffs Linda and James Tucker own plaintiff Eagle Industries, Inc. (Eagle). Defendant is the attorney who represented plaintiffs in a lawsuit involving Toyoda Machinery USA, Inc. (Toyoda). Eagle was interested in bidding on government contracts for which it needed a specialized machine. Toyoda represented that it had a machine that would meet Eagle’s needs, and Eagle purchased the machine. However, the machine did not perform as represented, and Eagle was unable…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Payless Drug Stores Northwest v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Morrill v. RountreeOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Toomey v. MOORE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Wescold, Inc. v. Logan International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Robinowitz v. PozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- In re ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1997