Associated Oil Co. v. La Branch
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The complaint avers that “during the period March 1, 1929, to June 1, 1929, both inclusive, the plaintiff, at the special instance and request of the defendant, sold and delivered to the defendant * * * merchandise of the agreed value of $2,081.20,” that only $1,053.62 has been paid on account, and demands judgment for the sum of $1,027.58. The answer admits the averments just quoted, but denies that any balance remains due to the plaintiff. It avers that between March 1, 1929, and May 31, 1929, the plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendants merchandise of the agreed value of $2,081.50…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wicks v. MetcalfOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- McCabe Const. Co. v. Utah Const. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1912
- McFarland v. HuenersOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Fischer v. BayerOregon Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hughes v. HelzerOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Shell Oil Co. v. BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Ball v. Associated Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Nicholson v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Fogdall v. Lewis & Clark CollegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.