Legal Opinion

Dorsey Et Ux. v. Tisby Et Ux.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1951PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants, husband and wife, from a decree of the Circuit Court which granted to the plaintiffs, husband and wife, strict foreclosure of a real estate sales contract signed January 19, 1949, by the plaintiffs, as vendors, and by the defendants, as purchasers.

The defendants, as appellants, submit three assignments of error. The first claims that error was committed when the trial court refused to dismiss the complaint “in that the said contract was void and unenforceable for want of consideration.” The second assigns error to the refusal to dismiss the complaint

“in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shiver v. Liberty Building-Loan Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Branch v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Crawford v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Biersdorf v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Alaska Creamery Products, Inc. v. WellsAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Security State Bank v. LuebkeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Weatherford v. WEATHERFORDOregon Supreme Court · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API