Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Montgomery Elevator Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 1983No. A7902 00828; CA A23627PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

A boy was injured in plaintiffs store when he caught his foot between the moving stairs and the stationary side wall of a moving escalator that had been manufactured and installed by defendant. Plaintiff and defendant each paid $15,000 to settle the action for damages brought against them by the boy. Plaintiff then brought this action for indemnity on the basis of a provision in the contract by which defendant agreed to build and install the escalator. Defendant counterclaimed for the same relief on the basis of a provision in a subsequent agreement for maintenance of the escalator. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. LaymanOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Cook v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Waggoner v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Nicholson v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Tuality Community Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Dept. of Forestry v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Zoeller v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Forestry v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Tuality Community Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API