Legal Opinion
Lusk Lumber Co. v. Independent Producers Consol.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1931No. 1692PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rinee, Justice.
This case again comes to this court by direct appeal. Its disposition on its first appearance is reported in Lusk Lumber Co. v. Independent Producers Consolidated, et al., 35 Wyo. 381, 249 Pac. 790, 36 Wyo. 34, 252 Pac. 1029, and there the facts involved in the litigation on its merits are fully detailed. It will be unnecessary to repeat them here, as we are now concerned with what occurred subsequent to the return of the case to the District Court and matters which, as it happens, do not concern the merits.
Pursuant to the mandate of this court, leave was given the plaintiff to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Leadville Coal Co. v. McCreerySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Gardner v. School Dist. No. 87, Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Muskogee Times-Democrat v. Com'rs of Muskogee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carpenter & Carpenter, Inc. v. KinghamWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
- Catamount Construction v. Timmis EnterprisesWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Grimes Savings Bank v. McHargSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Fitzpatrick v. StevensonMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Lusk Lumber Co. v. Independent Producers ConsolidatedWyoming Supreme Court · 1933