Legal Opinion

Grimes Savings Bank v. McHarg

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 14, 1933No. 42281PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kintzinger, J.-

The only questions raised in this appeal are whether or not the court erred in dismissing defendants’ plea in abatement; and in overruling defendants’ motion to dismiss Myerly’s petition of intervention. The facts upon which the questions raised are to be determined are substantially as follows:

In January, 1930, the plaintiff bank obtained judgment against the defendant Maggie McHarg for about $9,400 and interest. That, during the period of the indebtedness upon which said judgment was obtained, the defendant Maggie McHarg, in October, 1925, conveyed two tracts of land…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Searles v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Knadler v. SharpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  4. Kreuger v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Newbert v. CunninghamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grimes Savings Bank v. McHargSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  2. Grimes Savings Bank v. JordanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  3. Lundy v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  4. Finken v. Douglas J. W.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2018
  5. Berrum v. GeorgettaNevada Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API