Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 21, 1927No. 154, 187PublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
These. are motions for substitution of a new party-appellant in each cause. The motions are joined in by the counsel of record for the defendants in error and by the plaintiff in error. They show that the Oklahoma Natural Gas Company was a corporation of the State of Oklahoma organized in the Indian Territory in October, 1906, to have existence for twenty years, and that, its charter would have expired by legal limitation in October, 1926; that about September 15, 1926, after the writs of error in these cases were allowed, the Oklahoma Natural Gas Company was reorganized, the resulting…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shulthis v. McDougalSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mumma v. Potomac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1834
- National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Pendleton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ex Parte Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Forty-One Thirty-Six Wilcox Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Walling v. James v. Reuter, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor v. Alturas de Florida Development Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993
- Kevin Gross, as Receiver for Hougland Barge Line, Inc., a Dissolved Delaware Corporation v. Frances M. HouglandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.