Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Stevenson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1937No. 7,651PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ang-Stman

This action came on for trial before the court sitting with a jury, and, after some evidence had been introduced, defendants objected to the introduction of further evidence on the ground that the supplemental complaint was insufficient. The court sustained the objection and dismissed the jury. Plaintiff was given ten days within which to amend his complaint; he elected to stand upon the complaint, and judgment was entered dismissing the action. Hence the only question involved is the sufficiency of the supplemental complaint.

The supplemental complaint alleges, in substance, that on and prior…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gilna v. BarkerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. HopkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Lakeside Irr. Co. v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Mieyr v. Federal Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State v. WoodMontana Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KarathanosMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. WinterMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. KarathanosMontana Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API