Legal Opinion

Carpenter & Carpenter, Inc. v. Kingham

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1941No. 2172PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

Statement of Facts.

In this action the plaintiff, Carpenter & Carpenter, a corporation, alleged that on March 12, 1930, it became indebted to the defendant Kingham; that at that time a deed was executed to defendant for Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block 99 of the City of Cheyenne, Wyoming, which was intended as a mortgage; that at the same time, the defendant executed a contract of sale for the property; that the mortgage has been paid. Plaintiff asked that defendant be required to convey the property to plaintiff, and for such other relief as is equitable. The court held the transaction…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Seymour v. Spring Forest Cemetery Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue & Taxation v. IrvineWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Capwell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Thomasi v. KochWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Eaton v. SontagSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. Courtenay C. & Lucy Patten Davis Foundation v. Colorado State University Research FoundationWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API