Lower Colorado River Authority v. Hughes
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BLAIR, Justice.
This appeal arose out of a condemnation proceeding instituted by appellant, Lower Colorado River Authority, to condemn 320 acres of land belonging to appellees, Fritz' Hughes and wife, and others alleged to have an interest therein, for use in the construction of Marshall Ford dam. The commissioners appointed awarded appellees $10,000 as their damages. Both appellant and appellees appealed from said award, appellant claiming that it was excessive and appellees claiming that it was insufficient. By a written statement filed at the beginning of the trial, appellees admitted the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grayce Oil Co. v. PetersonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Jackson & EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Taylor County v. OldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. AmasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Fort Worth & D. N. Ry. Co. v. SuggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Foley Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Lower Nueces River Water Supply District v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Southwestern Public Service Co. v. GoodwineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Continental Pipe Line Co. v. KielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.