Legal Opinion

Grayce Oil Co. v. Peterson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1936No. 5978PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This case is fully stated in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals (37 S. W. (2d) 367), and an elaborate restatement in this opinion is unnecessary.

The plaintiffs in error, Grayce Oil Company et ah, instituted the suit to recover the value of oil alleged to have been diverted from their producing wells by the operation of a vacuum pump of defendants in error in producing oil from a well, or wells, adjacent to those of the plaintiffs in error, but on a separate lease. The action was also for damages alleged to have been suffered because of the depreciation in market value of the properties…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Holland v. NimitzTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Southland Life Ins. v. HopkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Harris v. ShaferTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Durrett v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Peterson v. Grayce Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. McCauley v. Consolidated UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Moore v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Elliff v. Texon Drilling. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. London Terrace, Inc. v. McAlisterTexas Supreme Court · 1944

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API