Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 6, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This appeal follows a trial court’s order denying Appellants’ application to vacate, modify and/or correct an award of arbitrators. The trial court concluded that under its limited scope of review of arbitration matters, the decision rendered in this underinsured motorist case could not be disturbed for the reasons advanced by Appellants. We agree and affirm the trial court’s order.

Appellants and their deceased son, Randy, were insured by two policies of insurance issued by Appellee, Aetna, which each had liability coverage of $100,000, but only $35,000 of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Davis v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Azpell v. Old Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Houston v. National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Martin v. State Automobile Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nealy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Hartford Insurance v. O'MaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WalkoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Calabrese v. Colonial Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2000
  5. Friel v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API