Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Walko
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 6, 2000No. 3:00 CV 0023PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MUNLEY, District Judge.
Before the court for disposition is the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Raymond J. Durkin which recommends that the defendants’ motion to dismiss be denied. The defendants, Richard Walko and Sharon Walko, have filed objections to the report and recommendation. The matter has been fully briefed and is thus ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, the objections will be sustained, and the motion to dismiss will be granted.
Background
Defendant Sharon Walko was involved in an automobile accident on June 17,1997. At the time of the accident,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Henderson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Bateman v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Brennan v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Nationwide Insurance Company of Columbus, Ohio v. Marcie Patterson. Marcie Patterson, Counter-Claimant v. Nationwide Insurance Company of Columbus, Ohio, Counter-Defendant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company of Columbus, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Nealy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hartford Insurance v. O'MaraDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000