Legal Opinion

Houston v. National Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1986No. 280PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment which resulted from an order denying appellant’s petition to vacate or modify an arbitration award. We affirm.

On February 23, 1985 appellee was involved in an automobile accident in which he sustained injuries. He accepted $15,000 from Northland Insurance Company which represented the limits of a policy carried by the operator of the other vehicle involved in the accident.

Pursuant to his own policy with appellant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, appellee filed an underinsured motorist claim. The Nationwide policy provides for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Pirches v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Ostroff v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Martin v. State Automobile Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Winters v. Erie Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Popskyj v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Schultz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Conrad v. Progressive Casualty Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County1987
  5. Fisher v. USAA Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API