Legal Opinion

Caro v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1997No. Docket Nos. G016245, G016461PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

saying, are not worth the paper they are written on. Defendant’s lawyers would give the same short shrift to a stipulation signed by one of them to submit a personal injury claim to binding arbitration. They call the stipulation worthless because their client did not personally sign it. They say plaintiff’s counsel acted at his peril in taking them at their word concerning their authority to stipulate on their client’s behalf.

Defendant did not sign the stipulation. But she participated in the arbitration, expressly acknowledging to the arbitrator her understanding that it…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Pierotti v. TorianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & GladstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Evans v. CENTERSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Toal v. TardifCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API