Toal v. Tardif
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IKOLA, J.
A dispute arose between plaintiffs Adam and Joy Toal and defendants Valere A. and Helen Tardif. Each couple’s attorney signed a stipulation to resolve the dispute through private arbitration. Although the parties themselves did not sign the stipulation, the document stated the attorneys’ signatures were “for” their clients.
Arbitration ensued. The arbitrator entered an award in plaintiffs’ favor. Plaintiffs petitioned the court for confirmation of the arbitration award. They attached a copy of the arbitration stipulation to their petition, but presented no evidence that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Molecular Analytical Systems v. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Espejo v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Habash v. L.A Pacific Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Ashburn v. AIG Financial Advisors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.