State v. Dowd
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This case arises out of condemnations undertaken in order to convert U.S. Highway 183 in Austin to an elevated, eontrolled-ac-cess highway. This project is described in more detail in State v. Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d 769 (Tex.1993). In this case, the jury was asked whether the State negotiated in good faith. Based on its negative answer, the trial court dismissed the condemnation action on the ground that the State failed to establish, as a jurisdictional prerequisite for a condemnation proceeding, that the parties were unable to agree on a price. The court of appeals affirmed. 832 S.W.2d 71. We…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HippCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Malcomson Road Utility District v. Newsom, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Marburger v. Seminole Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Collin County v. Hixon Family Partnership, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.