Malcomson Road Utility District v. Newsom
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
TIM TAFT, Justice.
Appellant, Malcomson Road Utility District (“the District”), has moved for rehearing. So has appellee, Frank George Newsom. We grant the District’s rehearing motion, deny Newsom’s, withdraw our opinion of June 5, 2003, and substitute this opinion in its stead.
The District appeals from two final judgments that denied its motions for partial *261summary judgment; granted Newsom’s motions for summary judgment; denied the District the right to condemn New-som’s property; awarded Newsom attorney’s fees and possession of and improvements on the property that the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Flameout Design & Fabrication, Inc. v. Pennzoil Caspian Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Womack v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1956
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- City of Austin v. Harry M. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Wilson v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
- Ernest Navy v. College of the Mainland, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- State v. PR Investments & Specialty Retailers, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Circle X Land & Cattle Co. v. Mumford Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.