Legal Opinion
Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided January 23, 2002No. 01-99-00691-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINIONS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.
We grant appellee’s motions for rehearing, withdraw our opinions and judgments dated July 27, 2000, and substitute these opinions in their stead.
These are four eminent domain cases, in which appellee, San Jacinto Gas Transmission Company (San Jacinto) brought condemnation proceedings against the appellants, various landowners (the Landowners), to condemn easements for the construction, operation, and maintenance of a 12 inch natural gas pipeline over the property of the Landowners. 1 The trial courts rendered partial summary judgments…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. ReynaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Amason v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Houston North Shore Railway Co. v. TyrrellTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Malcomson Road Utility District v. Newsom, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Cusack Ranch Corp. v. MidTexas Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Pitts v. Sabine River Authority of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Harrison Interests, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.