Legal Opinion

State v. Schmidt

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1994No. D-1006PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HECHT, Justice.

The principal issue in these two consolidated cases is whether a landowner, part of whose property is taken by power of eminent domain to convert a roadway into a controlled access highway, is entitled to compensation for a diminution in the value of the remainder due to a diversion of traffic, an increased circuity of travel to the property, a lessened visibility to passersby, and the inconvenience of construction activities. The lower courts allowed the compensation in both these cases. State v. Schmidt, 805 S.W.2d 25 (Tex.App.—Austin 1991); State v. Austex, Ltd., 862…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. DuPuy v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Interstate Northborough Partnership v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HealTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. BiggarTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. City of Houston v. Texan Land and Cattle Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API