State v. Schmidt
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HECHT, Justice.
The principal issue in these two consolidated cases is whether a landowner, part of whose property is taken by power of eminent domain to convert a roadway into a controlled access highway, is entitled to compensation for a diminution in the value of the remainder due to a diversion of traffic, an increased circuity of travel to the property, a lessened visibility to passersby, and the inconvenience of construction activities. The lower courts allowed the compensation in both these cases. State v. Schmidt, 805 S.W.2d 25 (Tex.App.—Austin 1991); State v. Austex, Ltd., 862…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- DuPuy v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Interstate Northborough Partnership v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HealTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BiggarTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Houston v. Texan Land and Cattle Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.