Legal Opinion
Marburger v. Seminole Pipeline Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided October 9, 1997No. 14-96-00158-CVPublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELMAN, Justice.
The following opinion is substituted in place of that issued on June 19,1997.
In this fraud case, appellants (collectively, the “landowners”) appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of Seminole Pipeline Company (“Seminole”) and Coates Field Services, Inc. (“Coates”) on the ground that there are genuine issues of material fact. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
Background
Seminole is a common carrier pipeline company with a right of eminent domain to condemn property for pipeline right-of-way construction. The pipeline at issue in this ease was to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Brush v. Reata Oil & Gas Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
- Senn v. Texaco, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2001
- Elizondo v. TEXAS NAT. RESOURCE CONS. COM'N, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.