Ingram v. Johnston
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. John M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff, alleging the existence of an agreement of copartnership between himself and defendants, under and pursuant to which certain described land was purchased by defendants, asked for. a decree establishing the existence of such copartnership and for incidental equitable relief.
The court found that the partnership agreement was made as alleged, and that by virtue of the relationship and agreement so made between the parties, plaintiff was entitled to a one-eleventh, interest in the unsold property and in the net proceeds of that which had been sold, subject to certain liens and charges…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Koyer v. WillmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Whitley v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Epstein v. StahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Sheble v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Terry v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Daniels v. CampanelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1954