Coward v. Clanton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, and from an order refusing a new trial The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
The plaintiff and respondent brought his action in the court below, against the appellant, upon a contract which he avers in his complaint was one of partnership, by which the defendant was to furnish the capital to purchase real estate, and the plaintiff to furnish the necessary skill and labor in reselling the same, and to pay certain expenses connected therewith, the parties to share equally the profits realized from such resales; that a certain tract of land was purchased in pursuance of the contract, in the name of the defendant; that there was a net profit resulting from such resale,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chester v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Cook v. . BarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Gray v. Palmer & EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bunnel v. Taintor's administratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Lasry v. LedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Koyer v. WillmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.