Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Stahl

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1959No. Civ. 23665PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered on the sustaining of an amended demurrer to the first amended complaint without leave to amend in a suit for dissolution of an alleged joint venture and for an accounting.

The first amended complaint alleges:

1. In June, 1954, plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral joint venture agreement for the purpose of converting four old and useless buildings on realty then owned by defendant in Gardena, California, into modern apartment buildings for operation and resale.

2. By the agreement defendant agreed he would convey to plaintiff a half…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Vitek, Inc. v. Alvarado Ice Palace, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Fordham (In Re Fordham)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  4. Greene v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Brunzell Construction Co. v. Barton Developmnet Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API