Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. Pappas

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1947No. Civ. 13557PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

As shown by the citation in their opening brief of Bayley v. Souza, 55 Cal.App.2d 776 [131 P.2d 584], defendants are aware of the rule that binds this court on an appeal from an order granting a new trial where granted, as here, on the insufficiency of the evidence. “The law is well settled that where there is a substantial conflict in the evidence upon disputed issues which are material to the determination of the question of liability, the trial court may exercise its powers to set aside the verdict of a jury and order a new trial; and that under such circumstances its order will not be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Mann v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Carbaugh v. White Bus LineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Lewis v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Bayley v. SouzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coombs v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hudson v. RainvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Tice v. Kaiser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Estate of WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Toohey v. TooheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API