Legal Opinion

Bayley v. Souza

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1942No. Civ. No. 12140PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting a new trial as to two defendants, in an action for damages arising out of an automobile accident. The new trial was granted upon the ground of insufficiency of evidence, and the order so specified. This was the second trial of the action, and is the second appeal that has been taken therein.

The accident involved three cars. The plaintiffs, Robert and Florence Bayley, husband and wife, were the occupants of one car, and the other two were driven respectively by George A. Souza and Audrey Wheeler (now Mrs. Bates). Souza, Mrs. Bates, and Ethel Ewing, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. SissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bayley v. SouzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Whitfield v. De BrincatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Foley v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perry v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Hendricks v. PappasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Johns v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Haley v. Bay Cities Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API