Legal Opinion
Tice v. Kaiser Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1951No. Civ. 4144PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
The heirs of Roy Alfred Tice, deceased, plaintiffs and appellants, brought this action against defendant and respondent Kaiser Company, Inc., a Nevada corporation, for his wrongful death. The complaint alleges that on June 27, 1947, at Fontana, the deceased met his death as a result of being struck by a bridge crane, negligently operated by defendant. The answer of the Kaiser Company, Inc., which corporation operates a steel mill where the accident happened, admitted the employment of the crane operator, W. H. Machín, one of the defendants named herein (the cause of action against him was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Speck v. SarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Rogers v. Interstate Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Casetta v. United States Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Stout v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Nunnemaker v. HeadleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Anderson v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Christensen v. MalkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.