Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Rainville

California Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1956No. Sac. 6691PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Prom a judgment in favor of defendant after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals.

On March 6, 1951, about 5 p.m., an accident occurred in Tuba City on B Street. It runs in a generally easterly and westerly direction. Plaintiff lives on the north side of the street about 300 feet east of the point where the accident occurred. The street in front of plaintiff’s home is paved with concrete and is 56y% feet from curb to curb.

Two hundred sixty-six and one half feet west of a path which leads from plaintiff’s house to the sidewalk the concrete…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Huetter v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Salomon v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Putensen v. Clay Adams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Davy v. Public National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Spaziani v. MillarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Church of the Merciful Saviour v. Volunteers of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API