Legal Opinion

Toohey v. Toohey

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1950No. Civ. 14256PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This is a motion by respondent to dismiss an appeal on the ground that such appeal is frivolous.

The appellate courts are reluctant to dismiss an appeal on the ground of frivolity. Normally, the determination that an appeal is frivolous requires a full consideration of the ease on its merits, and for that reason should only be considered after full briefing by both litigants. But this is a rule of policy, not one of power. The appellate courts possess inherent power to dismiss an appeal where an examination of the judgment roll discloses that the appeal is frivolous, or where a mere inspection…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Tomkins v. TomkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Williams v. DuffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hendricks v. PappasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Worthley v. WorthleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Coleman v. Gulf Insurance GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Estate of WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Melancon v. Walt Disney ProductionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Estate of King v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API