Legal Opinion
Muller v. Muller
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1960No. Civ. 19074PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOOD, J. pro tem. *
On January 9, 1953, plaintiff William Muller initiated an action for 11 cancellation of alleged forged deed; for cancellation of deed for fraud and deceit; to remove a cloud; and to quiet title.” Defendants Lelah Muller and Charles Reagh filed answer on October 27, 1954, alleging defendant Muller to be the legal and equitable owner of the real property in question, and incorporating a copy of a prior judgment (Action No. 58211) quieting .title thereto in said defendant. On July 11, 1955, defendants filed a memorandum to set the cause for trial and the court subsequently set…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scheas v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- J. C. Penney Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Laubisch v. RoberdoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Adams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Thran v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Wiggins v. Washington Nat. Life Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Fannin Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Adams v. RosesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.