Adams v. Roses
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
Plaintiffs Judith Mildred Adams and Warren E. Adams appeal the judgment dismissing their action for failure to diligently prosecute it within two years. (Former Code of Civ. Proc., § 583. 1 ) We affirm the judgment and hold that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in dismissing the action. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 332 [216 Cal.Rptr. 718, 703 P.2d 58]; Luti v. Graco, Inc. (1985) 170 Cal.App.3d 228, 233 [215 Cal.Rptr. 902].) We also hold that section 411.30, requiring that plaintiffs file a certificate of merit prior to serving the summons and complaint…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- DeLuna v. St. Elizabeth's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Danielson v. ITT Industrial Credit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Schumpert v. Tishman Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Kuperman v. San Diego County Assessment Appeals Bd. No. 1California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Arambula v. Union Carbide Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.