Rutanen v. Baylis (In Re Baylis)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES F. QUEENAN, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
In a decision affirmed by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, 1 it has been determined that Carl E. Baylis, Esq. (the “Debtor”) failed to use reasonable care in attempting to prevent his co-trustee from committing a breach of trust. The question here is whether the ensuing judgments entered against the Debtor are nondischargeable in bankruptcy as debts for “defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity” or for “willful and malicious injury by the debtor ... to the property of another” within the meanings, respectively, of sections…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rutanen v. BaylisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Zohlman v. ZoldanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Spinoso v. Heilman (In Re Heilman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- M-R Sullivan Manufacturing Co. v. Sullivan (In Re Sullivan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Rutanen Ex Rel. Estate of Quevillon v. BaylisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002