Legal Opinion

Rutanen v. Baylis (In Re Baylis)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 12, 1998No. 19-40216PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES F. QUEENAN, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

In a decision affirmed by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, 1 it has been determined that Carl E. Baylis, Esq. (the “Debtor”) failed to use reasonable care in attempting to prevent his co-trustee from committing a breach of trust. The question here is whether the ensuing judgments entered against the Debtor are nondischargeable in bankruptcy as debts for “defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity” or for “willful and malicious injury by the debtor ... to the property of another” within the meanings, respectively, of sections…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rutanen v. BaylisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Zohlman v. ZoldanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  3. Spinoso v. Heilman (In Re Heilman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  4. M-R Sullivan Manufacturing Co. v. Sullivan (In Re Sullivan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  5. Rutanen Ex Rel. Estate of Quevillon v. BaylisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API