Legal Opinion

Kawaauhau v. Geiger

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1998No. 97-115PublishedCited by 1,989 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

Section 523(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a debt “for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another” is not dischargeable. 11 U. S. C. § 523(a)(6). The question before us is whether a debt arising from a medical malpractice judgment, attributable to negligent or reckless conduct, falls within this statutory exception. We hold that it does not and that the debt is dischargeable.

I

In January 1983, petitioner Margaret Kawaauhau sought treatment from respondent Dr. Paul Geiger for a foot injury. Geiger examined Kawaauhau and admitted her to the hospital to attend to the risk…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. McIntyre v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,989 opinions

  1. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. RitzSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Bullock v. BankChampaign, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Hohn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

1,984 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API