Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Bush
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1930No. Docket No. 435PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCary, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action against defendant alleging in his amended complaint the existence of a joint adventure between them regarding a real estate deal, that the joint adventure had been completed and certain profits made, all of which had been retained by defendant, and asked for an accounting. Defendant’s answer denied the allegations of the complaint and alleged that the action was barred by the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 339 of the-Code of Civil Procedure and that plaintiff was estopped to claim any share of the profits.
The court found for the most part in accordance…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Saunders v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hoge v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lasry v. LedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Mason v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Replogle v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.