Replogle v. Ray
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiffs sought declaratory relief and a money judgment against defendant. Defendant filed an answer and a cross-complaint seeking declaratory relief and a money judgment against plaintiffs. The complaint was in five counts. The cross-complaint was in four counts. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury and most of the issues were decided in favor of defendant. A judgment was entered on September 19, 1939, and thereafter, on September 22, 1939, a second judgment, denominated “Corrected Judgment,” was entered. Plaintiffs have appealed generally from both judgments. Defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- De Bairos v. BarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Anderson v. BlairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Andrews v. BushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- O'Hara v. HarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Lasry v. LedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Gastine v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Fitzgerald v. ProvinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.