Menefee v. Oxnam
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
Judgment was entered against plaintiffs upon a demurrer to their third amended complaint. The demurrer was general and special. This appeal is from that judgment.
The complaint shows plaintiffs’ case to he substantially as follows: On November 5, 1913, T. H. Oxnam, since deceased, as party of the first part, and these three plaintiffs and defendant MacDonald, as parties of the second part, entered into a written contract whereby Oxnam agreed to sell to plaintiffs and MacDonald an undivided four-fifths of a mine then owned by Oxnam, upon these terms: The parties of the second part, four in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Matteson v. WagonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Wright v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.