Legal Opinion
Anderson v. United States Secretary of Agriculture
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 20, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-186; Court 05-00329PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MemoraNdum Opinion and Order
POGUE, Judge.
On November 1, 2006, the court remanded the captioned matter for reconsideration of the defendant agency’s refusal to consider Plaintiffs claim that his net income declined on an accrual basis. Anderson v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 30 CIT -, 462 F.Supp.2d 1333 (CIT 2006). 1
Citing the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) in Steen v. United States, 468 F.3d 1357 (Fed.Cir.2006), the agency refused to comply with the court’s remand order. In Steen, the CAFC affirmed the application of the same agency regulation at issue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. United States Sec'y of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Ron Steen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Union Camp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Georgetown Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Hyundai Electronics Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dus & Derrick, Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Former Employees of International Business MacHines Corp. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Hacker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Anderson v. United States Sec'y of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Anderson v. United States Sec'y of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.