Legal Opinion
Ron Steen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 20, 2006No. 06-1109PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Ron Steen, a commercial fisherman, seeks review of a ruling by the Court of International Trade upholding the decision of the Department of Agriculture denying his application for a “trade adjustment assistance” cash benefit. We affirm.
I
A
The Trade Act of 1974, Pub.L. No. 93-618, 88 Stat.1978 (1975), provides for various forms of trade adjustment assistance for U.S. workers harmed by competition from imported goods. See 19 U.S.C. §§ 2271-2321. In 2002, Congress amended the statute to extend trade adjustment assistance to “agricultural commodity producers” similarly harmed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lady Kim T. Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Anderson v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Dus & Derrick, Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- O'Toole v. U.S. Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Lady Kim T. Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.