Legal Opinion
Georgetown Steel Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 1, 2003No. Slip Op. 03-38; Court 02-00739PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum & Order
AQUILINO, Judge.
Having disregarded this court’s final judgment, affirming its own determination after remand in another case, comes now the defendant U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) with a motion to stay this action for judicial review based upon its record compiled sub nom. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, Canada, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 67 Fed.Reg. 66,662 (Nov. 1, 2002), pending appeals taken from that judgment by exporters not parties to this action. For the reasons stated hereinafter, this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Standard Havens Products, Inc. v. Gencor Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Smith Corona Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anderson v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- An Giang Agriculture & Food Import Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Bldg. Sys. de Mexico, S.A. de C v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.